There was a wonderful article in the New York Times last week about why people think that their dogs are smart. Did you read the article too? If you didn't, and want to, here's the link:
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/15/science/pets-dogs-intelligence.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20260416&instance_id=174162&nl=the-morning®i_id=119526550&segment_id=218310&user_id=5b6f3acda3c1e75ce5f119e547e74d2e
I really love when science and mainstream media meet as it gives us all an opportunity to think about a topic in a more thoughtful way, looking more closely at where our own biases effect the way we think about the world. In this case, the way we think about dogs in general, and our own beloved canines, specifically.
Here's the gist of the article and why it's important: Researchers have consistently found that dog owners rank their dog's intelligence with what's called a "better than average effect," or what we referred to in the psychology classes I taught at UC Davis as "cognitive bias." Basically, we dog owners tend to overestimate the abilities of dogs in general, but we really tend to overestimate our own dog's intelligence. Remember that Border Collie that made the news and was even in a story on 60 Minutes? Her name was Chaser and she was a female Border Collie who could identify over 1000 toys by name. This is a feat known as "word learning" and it is actually rare as it takes a combination of dedicated direct instruction by the human caretakers and the dog's own natural ability to eavesdrop on human conversations about objects and make inferences. For some reason, herding dogs like Border Collies seem to excel at these tasks, but not every Border Collie excels like Chaser. So, why do people who participate in these studies consistently rank their dogs, regardless of breed, as being so cognitively gifted?
I was fascinated by the data here: While it is often stated that a dog's cognitive skills are on par with a human toddler (aged 1-3 years), this is really too simplistic a claim given the number of skills a toddler has that a dog doesn't and vice versa. And, yet, in a 2025 study, people consistently ranked their dogs as having equivalent cognitive skills as 3-5 year old children, and many people ranked their dogs as being on par cognitively with a 16 year old kid. In one study, about a quarter of the participants ranked dogs as smarter than most people! Only 6% of the study participants said their dogs possessed a lower than average intelligence. The conclusion I found most interesting was that the dog owners who were most emotionally bonded to their dogs gave higher cognitive skill ratings to ALL dogs, not just their own. So, somehow that emotional bond the study participants had with dogs caused them to rate dogs as more intelligent in a general sense. And they also rated their own dogs more favorably than the average dog on markers such as loyalty and friendliness, and not just intelligence. That, I think, is really important.
Dogs excel at reading people. They read our body language, facial expressions, etc. and make inferences from that. For example, when we look out a window, they'll often go over and look out too. Or if we point at something, they'll look where we are pointing. They'll get your attention when their ball rolls under the couch, demonstrating that they have object permanence; even though that ball is out of sight, they know it still exists. Some scientists even believe that dogs can understand that others have a different perspective than they themselves have, a skill previously thought to be limited to primates and dolphins.
So, while at least two thirds of us dog owners might be like those in the 2025 study, stating unequivocally that our dogs are smarter than the average dog, the truth is this: Most of us are, statistically speaking, more likely to be living with dogs on the lower end of the intelligence spectrum. And, you know what? That's not just okay, it's better than okay! There is absolutely nothing wrong with a dog who can't remember where they left their ball or has to be reminded every time to sit before they go out the door. Think of it this way: Intelligence in dogs is a gift and a curse. Really smart dogs like Chaser the Border Collie need almost constant engagement in the form of enrichment opportunities and mental stimulation so that they don't become bored, anxious, or destructive. In my opinion, a dog who excels at being a beloved family member is a dog to be desired and appreciated. Just because your dog has to be shown where you dropped the treat for him because a finger point in that direction is met with a blank stare, doesn't make your dog any less valuable than any other dog. There are so many ways to be smart other than showing a knack for word learning or object permanence.
Generally speaking, dogs have the uncanny ability to bloom where they are planted and that's a skill I wish more people had. They find joy in the mundane, they relish schedules and routine, and they are happy just to be with us. Your dog loves you unconditionally, so love him back for who he is: Your faithful, devoted companion whose most special ability is the one that allows him to bond to you and your family. Frankly, that's the skill that I value the most in a dog. In my mind, any dog can learn a party trick and the names of a few toys. Bright dogs know when it's time for dinner and get you into the kitchen to prepare it as if they were the ones wearing the smartwatch.
As always, if you have questions about your pet's behavior, you know where to find me.






